Seyed Mohammad Shafiei, M.A. Graduate in International Relations
Over the past decade, relations between China and Saudi Arabia have moved beyond the classical model of “energy in exchange for goods” and entered a phase that can be described as a strategic convergence between two transformative projects: Saudi Vision 2030 and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This convergence is not merely the coincidence of two development programs, but rather reflects a deeper transformation in the logic of international political economy—one in which domestic development, transnational connectivity, and the redefinition of power balances are intertwined. To understand this process between 2015 and 2024, it is necessary to examine three levels: the economic-structural level, the geoeconomic level, and the level of regional order.
Saudi Vision 2030 and the Belt and Road Initiative
Saudi Vision 2030, officially announced in 2016, represents an effort to reconstruct the Saudi economy based on diversification, privatization, attraction of foreign investment, and the development of non-oil sectors. Within this framework, Saudi Arabia seeks to transition from an economy dependent on oil rents to a production-based, service-oriented, and knowledge-based economy. The development of the tourism industry, strengthening of domestic military industries, investment in advanced technologies, expansion of the logistics sector, and transformation into a transit hub linking three continents are among the key objectives of this program.
This document can be considered a strategic response to the structural vulnerability of Saudi Arabia’s single-product economy to fluctuations in the global oil market—a vulnerability that became clearly evident during the price shocks of 2014 and later during the COVID-19 pandemic.
At the same time, China has been advancing the Belt and Road Initiative as a large-scale project of infrastructural and economic connectivity across Eurasia, Africa, and the Middle East. Officially, the project aims to facilitate trade, develop infrastructure, and deepen economic cooperation. However, many analysts argue that the BRI is not merely an infrastructure plan, but rather a framework for reconfiguring global production, supply, and investment networks. From this perspective, the BRI can be understood as an attempt to shape a form of “Chinese globalization,” in which physical connectivity (ports, railways, and industrial zones) is combined with financial and institutional connectivity (development banks and investment arrangements).
The convergence of these two initiatives takes shape precisely at the intersection of infrastructure and capital. To realize Vision 2030, Saudi Arabia requires investment, technology, and access to global trade networks. China, in turn, needs partners with key geopolitical positions and the capacity to absorb large-scale investments in order to advance the BRI. Saudi Arabia’s geographical location—linking the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, and maritime routes to Europe and Africa—makes it a critical node in the Eurasian connectivity network.
Saudi ports on the Red Sea can play an important role in conjunction with China’s maritime corridors, while newly established industrial zones can host Asian companies and facilitate re-export activities. From this viewpoint, cooperation between Beijing and Riyadh represents a form of structural synergy: China provides capital and engineering expertise, while Saudi Arabia offers markets, geographic position, and financial capacity.
However, this convergence is not purely economic; it is geoeconomic. The concept of geoeconomics emphasizes the use of economic instruments for strategic objectives. In contemporary literature, the Belt and Road Initiative is often analyzed as a tool to strengthen China’s position in the global order and expand its structural influence. If this framework is accepted, cooperation with Saudi Arabia constitutes part of China’s strategy to deepen its presence in the Middle East, secure energy supplies, and consolidate its role in global trade networks.
The Middle East continues to account for a significant share of China’s energy supply, and stable relations with major oil producers are vital for China’s economic growth. Conversely, by deepening its ties with China, Saudi Arabia pursues a policy of diversifying its strategic partners—a policy that can be understood within the framework of “multi-alignment.” In recent years, Riyadh has sought to expand relations with Asian powers, especially China, without breaking away from the United States. This approach reflects a realist understanding of the gradual transition of the international system toward a form of relative multipolarity. In such an environment, excessive dependence on a single power can impose geopolitical costs.
In the energy sector, China–Saudi relations remain the central pillar of cooperation. China is one of the world’s largest importers of crude oil, and Saudi Arabia has consistently been among China’s main suppliers in recent years. However, an important transformation is that cooperation has moved beyond crude oil exports to downstream sectors such as petrochemicals and refining. This trend indicates that the relationship is gradually shifting away from a simple exchange of resources for goods toward industrial partnership and mutual investment. Such a change aligns with the objectives of Vision 2030 in developing domestic industries and increasing value added.
Moreover, the financial and institutional dimensions of cooperation have also been strengthened. Saudi Arabia’s participation in China-related financial institutions, including the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), reflects Riyadh’s desire to diversify its sources of financing and integrate into emerging financial arrangements. This institutionalization lends greater stability to cooperation and moves it beyond ad hoc agreements toward a more sustainable framework. At the same time, such participation forms part of a broader trend of gradually shifting financial institutional weight from the West toward Asia.
Nevertheless, the convergence of Vision 2030 and the Belt and Road Initiative has not emerged in a geopolitical vacuum. Saudi Arabia remains embedded in a U.S.-led security structure and maintains deep defense dependencies on the West. Therefore, rapprochement with China does not imply a complete replacement of its traditional partner, but rather an effort to enhance bargaining power and reduce vulnerability. From the perspective of realism in international political economy, states under conditions of structural uncertainty seek to expand their security margins by diversifying economic relations. Saudi foreign policy over the past decade can be analyzed within this framework.
China has likewise adopted a cautious approach in the region. Unlike Washington, Beijing has shown limited willingness to assume a direct security role in the Middle East, instead focusing on economic cooperation, limited mediation, and maintaining balanced relations with rival actors. This strategy allows China to expand its economic influence without becoming entangled in costly security competitions. Within this framework, Saudi Arabia is not only an energy partner for China, but also a key node in the geoeconomic network of West Asia.
At the level of regional order, the convergence between Beijing and Riyadh may have implications beyond bilateral relations. If joint infrastructure and industrial projects proceed sustainably, Saudi Arabia could become a bridge between Asian networks and European and African markets. This outcome aligns with the logistics objectives of Vision 2030 and is simultaneously consistent with the connectivity logic of the Belt and Road Initiative. In such a scenario, Saudi Arabia would not only be an energy exporter, but also an active participant in regional value chains.
Future Prospects
The future of this convergence depends on several key variables:
- The continuation of relative stability in China–United States relations
- Saudi Arabia’s ability to implement domestic structural reforms
- China’s capacity to manage political and economic risks in its overseas projects
Experience in recent years has shown that large-scale infrastructure projects, in the absence of transparent institutional frameworks and precise risk management, can face serious challenges. Therefore, the sustainability of the convergence between Vision 2030 and the Belt and Road Initiative requires a balance between strategic ambition and operational realism.
Conclusion
The convergence of Saudi Vision 2030 and China’s Belt and Road Initiative can be regarded as a prominent example of the alignment of interests during a transitional phase in the global order. This cooperation is neither an ideological alliance nor a security pact, but rather a strategic partnership based on careful calculation of mutual interests.
Saudi Arabia seeks economic transformation, an enhanced regional role, and reduced structural dependence on oil. China aims to expand connectivity networks, ensure energy security, and consolidate its position in the global political economy. The intersection of these objectives has produced a framework of cooperation that may become, in the coming decade, one of the main axes of geoeconomic reconfiguration in Eurasia and West Asia.
References
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. (n.d.). About AIIB.
https://www.aiib.org/en/about-aiib/index.html
Belt and Road Portal. (2025). Talk with Ambassadors: BRI and Vision 2030 promote China-Saudi Arabia common development.
https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/p/0DLQOJVF.html
Belt and Road Portal. (2017). Belt and Road Initiative integrates with Saudi Vision 2030.
https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/p/12010.html
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Saudi Vision 2030.
https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/qh3fb54i/saudi_vision2030_en.pdf
People’s Daily Online. (2024). Saudi minister of media: China is a crucial partner in achieving Vision 2030.
https://en.people.cn/n3/2024/1114/c90000-20241929.html
Saudi Gazette. (2022). Al-Ajlan: Vision 2030 and BRI are economic strengths of Saudi Arabia and China.
https://www.saudigazette.com.sa/article/627758
Saudi Gazette. (2018). China, Saudi Arabia natural partners in advancing Belt and Road Initiative.
https://saudigazette.com.sa/article/578634
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023). China country analysis brief.
https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/CHN